Hanumant Manik Narote And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ANR

928-929-CriAppln-389-2020+ -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 928 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 389 OF 2020 MANIK RANGOBA NAROTE AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER .....

Advocate for Applicants : Mrs. Rashmi S. Kulkarni h/f Mr. Rode Dilip B.

APP for Respondent No.1 : Mr. S. P. Deshmukh Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. A. K. Shejwal .....

929 CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 390 OF 2020 HANUMANT MANIK NAROTE AND ANOTHER

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER .....

Advocate for Applicants : Mrs. Rashmi S. Kulkarni h/f Mr. Rode Dilip B.

APP for Respondent No.1 : Mr. R. V. Dasalkar Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. A. K. Shejwal .....

CORAM : V. K. JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR. C. MORE, JJ.

DATED : 16th NOVEMBER, 2021 PER COURT:- 1.

We have heard learned counsel for the applicants for some time. Learned counsel for the applicants in both the criminal applications, on instructions, seeks leave to withdraw the criminal applications with liberty to the applicants to file an application for

928-929-CriAppln-389-2020+ -2discharge in the pending case before the trial court. 2.

Leave granted. Both the criminal applications are dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to each of the applicants to file an application for discharge in the pending case before the trial court. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) (V. K. JADHAV, J.) vre