Tushar Yashwant Gaikwad And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another
{1}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 437 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1563 OF 2021 Tushar Yashwant Gaikwad & others Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. P. S. Shinde, advocate for the applicants Mr. S. J. Salgare, APP for Respondent No.1-State. CORAM : V.K.JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.
DATE : 16th February, 2022.
PC :
Heard.
Learned Counsel for the applicants submits that on the date of the previous hearing, he was busy in another matter and as such could not remain present at the time of hearing of this application.
We have also heard learned A. P. P. for RespondentState. By an order dated 31.01.2022, we have dismissed Criminal Application No. 1563 of 2021, for want of prosecution.
{2} In view of the same and for the reasons stated in the application, Criminal Application No. 437 of 2022 is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B", subject to cost of Rs.500/- to be paid to the Library of Advocates' Association of Bombay High Court, Bench at Aurangabad.
Criminal Application No.437 of 2022 is accordingly disposed of.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V.K.JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb
{3}
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1563 OF 2021 Tushar Yashwant Gaikwad & others Applicants
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Mr. P. S. Shinde, advocate for the applicants Mr. S. J. Salgare, APP for Respondent No.1-State. CORAM : V.K.JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.
DATE : 16th February, 2022.
PC :
List this Criminal Application for hearing on 16.03.2022.
(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V.K.JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb