Sandu Thamaji Mhaske v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 ca 1155.20+

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1155 OF 2020 IN WP/992/2019 ANUSAYABAI BHIMRAO PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Irale Patil D. R. AGP for Respondents / State : Mr. S. G. Karlekar Advocate for Respondents No. 4 & 5 :

Mr. M. N. Navandar ...

916 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.1179 OF 2020 IN WP/2649/2019 SANDU THAMAJI MHASKE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Irale Patil D.r.

AGP for Respondents / State : Mrs. M. A. Deshpande Advocate for Respondents No. 3 & 4 :

Mr. M. N. Navandar ...

CORAM:S. V. GANGAPURWALA & SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE: 31st JANUARY, 2020 PER COURT:

1.

Mr. Navandar, the learned counsel opposes the applications for amendment on the ground that the same are not in tune with the reliefs claimed in the original writ petitions.

2 ca 1155.20+ 2.

The writ petitions are at a nascent stage.

The non-applicants will have every opportunity to controvert the averments sought to be introduced by way of an amendment. For the reasons stated in civil applications, civil applications are allowed. The applicants are permitted to amend the memo of the writ petitions.

3.

Civil Applications are disposed of.

[SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.] [S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J.] marathe