← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/5608/2021delay condonatedrejected

Farjana Rashid Pathan And ORS v. The Div. Controller, M.S.R.T.C., Ahmednagar

2022-10-03Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More1 pages

( 1 ) 50 ca 5608.21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 50 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5608 OF 2021 IN FAST/3998/2021 FARJANA RASHID PATHAN AND ORS

VERSUS

THE DIV. CONTROLLER, M.S.R.T.C., AHMEDNAGAR ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Shaikh Mazhar A. Jahagirdar Advocate for Respondents : Mr. Anand Dale h/f. S.S. Rathi ...

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE :

3rd October, 2022 P.C.:- Heard rival submissions.

2.

The applicants are seeking condonation of delay of only 112 days. The learned counsel for the respondent-MSRTC strongly opposed the application on the ground that delay is not properly explained. However, considering the statutory right of the applicants and the reasons stated in the application the delay of 112 days stands condoned subject to condition that the applicants-claimants shall not claim any interest for the aforesaid period of delay. Appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections if any. Civil Application is accordingly disposed of.

[SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE] mub JUDGE