Madhav Dangal Patil v. Surekha Yashwant Patil And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 924 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 144 OF 2025

1. SUREKHA YASHWANT PATIL

2. MAHESH NATTHU THAKUR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Girish S. Rane APP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. P. Sonpawale ...

WITH CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 434 OF 2025 IN ABA/144/2025 MADHAV DANGAL PATIL

VERSUS

SUREKHA YASHWANT PATIL AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant :

Mr. A. I. Deshmukh h/f. Mr. Pawar Hemantkumar F. APP for Respondent/State: Mr. S. P. Sonpawale Advocate for Respondents No.1 & 2: Mr. G. S. Rane ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 05.02.2025 P.C. :

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicants, the learned APP for the respondent-State and the learned counsel for the assist to public prosecutor.

2] The application for assist to public prosecutor is allowed.

3] The applicants have approached this Court apprehending arrest in connection with Crime No.164/2024, registered with Marwad Police Station, Taluka Amalner, District Jalgaon, for the offences punishable under Sections 466, 467, 468, 470, 474, 420, 34 and 120-B of the IPC.

4] At the request of the learned APP, stand over to 20.02.2025.

5] Interim protection would be granted to the applicants till the next date only. However, it is clarified that, it is not granted on merits. This court will consider the matter on merits on the next date.

6] In the meanwhile, there shall be interim order in the following terms :- A] Till the next date, in the event the applicants are arrested in connection with Crime No.164/2024, registered with Marwad Police Station, Taluka Amalner, District Jalgaon, for the offences punishable under Sections 466, 467, 468, 470, 474, 420, 34 and 120-B of the IPC, they shall be released on bail on

furnishing PR bond of Rs.15,000/- each with one or two sureties in the like amount.

B] The applicants shall remain present before the investigating officer as and when required by the investigating officer.

C] The applicants shall co-operate with the investigation, including producing all documents in his possession, as may be demanded by the investigating officer.

D] The applicants shall not influence the informant, witnesses or any person concerned with the case and he shall not tamper with the evidence. 7] Needless to say, violation of any of the aforesaid conditions may result in this order being cancelled. 8] List on 20.02.2025.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE marathe