Geetabai Pratapsing Parmar And ORS v. B. Shankar Rangarao And ORS

- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 929 OF 2013 IN FAST/3893/2012 Geetabai Pratapsing Parmar & others ....Applicants

VERSUS

B. Shankar Rangarao & others .....Respondents Mr. K. M. Nagarkar, Advocate for Applicants.

Mr. Usmanpurkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 10th OCTOBER, 2025.

PER COURT :

1.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 86 days in taking exception to the order passed in MACP No. 660/2008 by Adhoc District Judge -2 and Member, MACT Nanded, on 13.07.2011. 2.

Applicant No. 1 is the widow, Applicant Nos. 2 and 3 are children and Applicant Nos. 4 and 5 are the parents of deceased Pratapsingh who died on 03.03.2008 in a motor vehicular accident. 3.

No reply is filed by the Respondents. For the reasons mentioned in the Application which have gone unchallenged, this is a

- 2 - fit case for condonation of delay of 86 days which is neither inordinate nor deliberate.

4.

In view of above, Application stands allowed in terms of prayer clause 'B'.

5.

Contention of learned counsel for Respondents with regard to statutory interest would be considered at the time of final decision of the Appeal.

( R. M. JOSHI) Judge dyb

- 3 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD FIRST APPEAL ST NO 3893/2012 Geetabai Pratapsing Parmar & others ....Appellant

VERSUS

B. Shankar Rangarao & others .....Respondents Mr. K. M. Nagarkar, Advocate for Appellants.

Mr. Usmanpurkar, Advocate for Respondent Nos. 2 and 3. CORAM : R. M. JOSHI, J.

DATE : 10th OCTOBER, 2025.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Issue notice to Respondents returnable on 24.11.2025. Leanred counsel Mr. Usmanpurkar waives service of notice on behalf of Respondent Nos. 2 and 3.

( R. M. JOSHI) Judge dyb