← Library
Bombay High CourtCP/135/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Layak Najirsab Bijapure And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2019-11-19Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Anil S. Kilor3 pages

( 1 )

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO.135 OF 2019 IN WRIT PETITION NO.13046 OF 2017 1.

Layak s/o Najirsab Bijapure, Age: 40 years, Occ: Sweeper, R/o. Badhur, Tq. Nilanga, Dist. Latur 2.

Datta s/o Shankarrao Antredi, Age: 30 years, Occ: Sweeper, R/o. Aurad Shahani, Tq. Nilanga, Dist. Latur PETITIONERS

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra (Through the Secretary, Home Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai) 2.

Director General of Police, Mumbai Region, Mumbai Dr. Rajendra Mane, The Superintendent of Police, Latur, Tq. & Dist. Latur RESPONDENTS Mr Prashant B. Jadhav, Advocate for the petitioner; Mr S.P. Sonpawale, A.G.P. for respondents CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & ANIL S. KILOR, JJ.

DATED :

19th NOVEMBER, 2019

( 2 ) ORAL ORDER:

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the petitioners.

2.

In response to the simple notice issued to respondent No.3 by this Court vide order dated 13th March, 2019, an affidavit in reply is filed through Dr. Rajendra Shankarrao Mane, Superintendent of Police, Latur. Learned A.G.P. invited our attention to the copy of order passed by Superintendent of Police, Latur dated 3rd August, 2018 placed on record as annexure-R-3. Perusal of this order shows that the decision taken by the State Government based on the Government Notification dated 28th September, 2010 providing the amount against basic salary plus 60% of special pay to the part time sweepers and petitioners name find place in the list at serial Nos. 22 and 37 and amount referred against their names is Rs.3416/- respectively.

( 3 ) As the decision is taken by the State Government, it can safely be stated that the order of this Court is duly complied with. Neeless to state that in case, the petitioners are having any grievance against the order dated 3rd August, 2018, they are at liberty to take appropriate steps by approaching the competent forum including any judicial forum if so advised. The contempt petition is accordingly disposed of.

[ANIL S. KILOR, J.] [PRASANNA B. VARALE,J.] Tupe