Laxmibai Pandharinath Tawale v. The Union Of India Thro The Dy Secretary Govt Of India New Delhi And Others

(3) WP-2153-2020

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2153 OF 2020 Laxmibai Pandharinath Tawale .. Petitioner

Versus

The Union of India and ors.

..Respondents Mr M.K. Bhosle, Advocate for petitioner Ms R.P. Gaur, A.G.P. for respondents no.2 and 3 CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE : 11th February 2020 ORAL ORDER :

1.

The learned A.G.P. relies on the Government Resolution dated 2.6.2016 to contend that the claim of the husband of the petitioner now cannot be considered.

2.

We have also heard Mr Bhosle, learned Advocate for the petitioner. According to the learned Advocate, the claim of the husband of the petitioner was pending and was never rejected.

3.

In view of the Government Resolution dated 2.6.2016, it would not be possible to consider the case of the present petitioner. 4.

Writ Petition as such is disposed of. No costs. ( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, J.) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) vvr