Tuljabhavani Mahila Sah.Dudh Utp.Sah.S.M.Kharola v. State Of Maharashtra And ORS.

{1} wp 4747.98.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.4747 OF 1998 Tuljabhavani Mahila Sahkari Dudh Utpadak Sahkari Sanstha Maryadit Kharola, Tq. Renapur, Dist. Latur Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others Respondents Mr. R.T. Nagargoje advocate for the petitioner Mr. S.P. Deshmukh, AGP for Respondent Nos.1 to 3 _______________ CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J (Date : 13th July, 2017.) PER COURT :- The only grievance of the petitioner is that, respondent No.4 - proposed society could not have been permitted to open a bank account, followed by which, there is a registration of the society and thereafter the society would come into existence. Reliance is placed on the Judgment of this Court dated 8.12.1994 delivered in Writ Petition No.4843/94 in the matter of Vedganga Sahakari Dudh Vyavasayeek Sanstha Maryadeet versus State of Maharashtra and others .

The petitioner is unaware as to whether there is any further change in the Policy of the department of Cooperation. When this

{2} wp 4747.98.odt Court has refused interim relief on 9.9.1999, respondent No.4 must have come into existence.

None appears for respondent No.4 I am of the view that this petition is rendered infructuous. As such, this petition is disposed of as infructuous Rule is discharged.

Needless to state, if the petitioners grievance against respondent No.4 still exists, post registration, the petitioner would be at liberty to take recourse to such remedy as may be permissible in law.

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE , J) vbd