Udhav Dnyanoba Thombare v. Shri Sant Shiromani Maroti Maharaj Co-Operative Sugar Factory Ltd., Belkund And Another

( 1 ) crirev52.22

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

TBENCH AT AURANGABAD 921 CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO.52 OF 2022 UDHAV DNYANOBA THOMBARE

VERSUS

SHRI SANT SHIROMANI MAROTI MAHARAJ CO-OPERATIVE SUGARFACTORY LTD., BELKUND AND ANOTHER Mr.S.B. Choudhari, Advocate for the applicant. Mr.V.N. Tuvar, Advocate for respondent No.1.

Mrs.P.V. Diggikar, APP for the respondent/State.

CORAM

:

KISHORE C. SANT, J.

DATED :

21.09.2022 PC :- 01.

Heard both the sides. Both the parties have placed on record the compromise entered between the parties. By the earlier order dated 11.02.2022 it is already recorded that an amount of Rs.1,14,000/- is paid by the applicant to the sugarcane factory and an amount of Rs.6000/- was to be deposited. It is contended that an amount of Rs. Rs.30,000/- was remaining to be paid. But said amount is already deposited in the Trial Court. Thus, the applicant has paid the entire amount. The respondent has only to withdraw the remaining amount of Rs.30,000/-, which is lying in the Court of Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Ausa. The complainant is at liberty to withdraw the amount lying in the Trial Court.

( 2 ) crirev52.22 02.

In view of the ratio laid down in the judgment by the Hon' ble Apex Court in the case of Damodar S. Prabhu Vs. Sayed Babalal H. (2010) 5 SCC 663, the matter is permitted to be compounded. The compromise deed is taken on record and marked as Exh. "X" for identification. 03.

The Criminal Revision Application is disposed of in terms of the compromise deed.

[KISHORE C. SANT, J.] snk/2022/SEP22/crirev52.22