Hussain Amir Khan Nadaf And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO.112 OF 2007 [Hussain Amir Khan Nadaf and others vs The State of Maharashtra and others] _________________________________________________________________________________ Office Notes, Office | Memoranda of Coram, | appearances, Court's | Court's or Judge's orders orders or | directions and | Registrar's orders | _________________________________________________________________________________. ....

Shri V.D.Godbharle, advocate for the petitioners Shri K.S.Patil, A.P.P.for respondent no.1 Shri S.V.Salunke,advocate h/f Shri V.D.Salunke, advocate for resp.nos. 2 to 6 .....

CORAM : SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.

DATED : 4th JULY, 2016 PER COURT :

Heard. Rule.

The Sub-Divisional Magistrate, Latur passed an order, dated 20.3.2006 under Section 133 of the Criminal Procedure Code thereby directing the petitioners to remove the cotton carding machine from the general public road.

2.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the said order is under challenge in this petition. The said order was stayed.

3.

The learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have voluntarily removed the machine from the said spot.

4.

In view of this, the challenge to the said order would become redundant.

Hence, the petition deserves to be disposed of. Rule is discharged accordingly.

5.

The petition stands disposed of. However, it is made clear that all contentions raised in the petition are kept open.

(SMT. SADHANA S. JADHAV, J.)

dbm/crwp112.07