Shaikh Mehmood Saleem Saheb Tamboli v. Nasima Begum Mehmud Saheb Tamboli And ORS

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD SECOND APPEAL NO. 616 OF 2000 Shaikh Mehmood s/o. Saleem Saheb Vs. Nasima Begum w/o. Mehmud Saheb Tamboli and Ors.

WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NOS. 95/2007, 2178/2012, 12288/2014 Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders Court's or Judge's orders Mr. Sachin Deshmukh, Advocate for appellant.

Mr. M.L. Dharashive, Advocate for respondent Nos. 1 and 3 to 5.

CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE, J.

DATED : 27th August, 2015.

PER COURT :

1. Learned counsels for both the sides present. They have filed compromise pursis. They submitted that parties have settled the dispute and they have filed the terms of compromise. In this proceeding they are requesting to prepare compromise decree accordingly. They have identified their respective clients who have signed on the pursis.

2. In view of this submission, compromise decree is to be prepared in terms of compromise pursis by modifying the decree given by the first appellate Court. Appeal is disposed of in those terms. Civil Applications are also disposed of.

[ T.V. NALAWADE, J. ] ssc/