Ravindra Bhaskar More v. State Of Maha And ORS

ord.sr.no.40.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 40 WRIT PETITION NO. 2302 OF 2004 RAVINDRA BHASKAR MORE

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHA & ORS ...

Advocate for Petitioner : Mr. V M Maney AGP for Respondent Nos. 1 to 3 : Mr. Y. G. Gujrathi Advocate for Respondent No. 5 : Mr. N. Irpatgire ...

CORAM :

R.D.DHANUKA AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED :

11th September, 2017 PER COURT :- 1.

Learned counsel for the petitioner states that during the pendency of this petition, the petitioner has been reinstated and all the backwages payable to the petitioner are already paid by the Government. In view of that, the matter has become infructuous. The learned counsel tenders a copy of the Communication dated 9th September-2017 issued by the respondents. Statement made by the learned counsel for the petitioner as accepted.

2.

Writ Petition No. 2302 of 2004 is dismissed as infructuous.

3.

Rule is discharged.

ord.sr.no.40.odt 4.

No order as to costs.

Sd/- sd/- ( SUNIL K. KOTWAL, J.) (R.D.DHANUKA, J.) ...

shp/-