Panchashila Bhaskar Bansode v. The State Of Mah And ORS

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2232 OF 2006 Panchashila Bhaskar Bansode Age 35 years, Occu. Service, R/o Marwadi Galli, Pragati Colony, Gangapur, Taluka Gangapur, District Aurangabad.

...

PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

The State of Maharashtra (through its Secretary, School Education Department, Mantralaya, Mumbai - 32) 2.

The Director of Education, M.S., Pune.

3.

The Deputy Director of Education, Aurangabad 4.

The Director, Maharashtra Educational Research & Training Institute, Sadashiv Peth, Pune - 30 5.

The Education Officer (Primary), Zilla Parishad, Aurangabad.

6.

Dyanprabodhini Shikshan Prasarak Mandal, Aurangabad (through its Secretary), R/o Plot No.B/3, Dwarka Residency, New Shreyanagar, Aurangabad, District Aurangabad 7.

The Head Master, Dyanprabodhini Public School, Gangapur, Taluka Gangapur, District Aurangabad.

...

RESPONDENTS

.....

Shri A.S. Kale, Advocate holding for Shri S.B. Talekar, Advocate for petitioner Shri S.B. Joshi, A.G.P. for respondents No.1 to 4 Shri D.R. Kale Patil, Advocate for respondent No.5 .....

CORAM:

R.D. DHANUKA AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

DATED:

16th August, 2017.

ORAL JUDGMENT (PER R.D. DHANUKA, J.):

1.

Learned A.G.P. for respondents No.1 to 4 does not dispute that the issue involved in this petition and the challenge to the impugned order dated 31/12/2005, cancelling admission of the petitioner to postal D.Ed. Course, issued by respondent No.4 is already concluded by judgment dated 7/12/2010 in Writ Petition No.610/2006 along with other companion mattes filed before this Court. The statement is accepted.

2.

In view of the fact that, in identical matters the impugned order dated 31/12/2005, which is subject matter of this Writ Petition, is already quashed and set aside by judgment and order dated 7/12/2010 in Writ Petition No.610/2006 along with other companion matters, and the said judgment applies to the facts of this case, we pass the following order :

ORDER

Writ Petition is allowed. Rule is made absolute in terms of prayer clause (A) of the Writ Petition. No order as to costs. (SUNIL K. KOTWAL) (R.D. DHANUKA) JUDGE JUDGE fmp/