← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1957/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Hasan And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2016-05-04Hon'Ble Shri Justice A.V. Nirgude,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya2 pages

sgp WP1957.2015

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1957 OF 2015 Shaikh Akbar Shaikh Hasan & Ors.

..

Petitioners..

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

..

Respondents .................

Mr. Nilkanth P. Bangar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. P. S. Patil, AGP for respondent/State Mr Sambhajirao S. Tope, Advocate for respondent No. 2 Mr H. I. Pathan, Advocate for respondent No. 3 ...................

CORAM : A.V.NIRGUDE & V.L. ACHLIYA, JJ.

DATED :

04.05.2016.

PER COURT :

.

The petitioner assails the order dated 26/12/2014 whereby the C.E.O. of the Maharashtra Wakf Board had asked the Tahsildar to cancel mutation entries in respect of land Survey No. 142 situated at Ladgaon, Vaijapur, Dist. Aurangabad. Mr. Bangar, learned counsel for the petitioners states that the petitioners are days of their forefather. The mutation entry is also sanctioned bearing No. 449/1, 449/4. According to the learned counsel, the C.E.O. directly issued communication to the Tahsildar to cancel mutation entries in the name of the petitioner.

sgp WP1957.2015 2.

Mr. Pathan, learned counsel appears for respondent No. 3 and submits that the C.E.O. is empowered under the provisions of the Wakf Act as per Government Resolution dated 13/7/2010 for directing to incorporate the name of Dargah.

3.

It is trite that when a revenue authority is intending to cancel a mutation entry, the same cannot be done without hearing the parties in whose favour of the mutation entry stands.

4.

We dispose of the Writ Petition with observation and direction that the Tahsildar or any such authority dealing with the mutation entry in respect of the mutation as it stands today in the name of petitioner shall not change said mutation entry without giving notice to the petitioner and/or interested persons and shall hear them before competent Court of law as the case may be. With these observations and directions, writ petition is disposed of. No costs.

[V.L.ACHLIYA, J.] [A.V. NIRGUDE, J.]