Tamboli Abdul Azim Abdul Karim v. The State Of Maharashtra

2025:BHC-AUG:6839

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 931 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN NO. 210 OF 2025 TAMBOLI ABDUL AZIM ABDUL KARIM

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr.Sidhesh V. Jadhwar a/w. Adv.Saeed S. Shaikh APP for Respondent-State : Mr.N.B.Patil ...

CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKER, J.

DATE : 07.03.2025 P.C. :

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicant and the learned APP for the respondent-State.

2] The applicant is apprehending arrest in connection with FIR No.609/2024, dated 13/12/2024, registered with Chawni Police Station, Aurangabad District Aurangabad, for the offences punishable under sections 420, 406, 504, 506 of the Indian Penal Code.

3] This Court, by order dated 17.02.2025, has granted interim protection in favour of the applicant for the submissions stated in para no.3, as noted below : 3.

The learned Counsel for the applicant submits that he has paid Rs.1,86,000/- towards the purchase of the vehicle. However, the

complainant is not in possession of the vehicle. He further submits that the vehicle has been attached by the finance company due to default of the informant and taken into possession, and as such, the applicant is not in possession of the vehicle. Therefore, the balance amount for the purchase has not been paid. The learned Counsel for the applicant further submits that the vehicle was taken into possession from the showroom. Considering the same interim protection is granted to the applicant.

4] The learned counsel for the applicant submits that in pursuance of the aforesaid order, the applicant has attended the concerned police station and has co-operated with the investigation. The learned counsel for the applicant submits that the vehicle has been attached by the Finance Company.

5] The learned APP, on instructions from the Investigating Officer, who is present before the Court, submits that the vehicle was seized and the same was released on supratnama.

6] In view of the above, the interim protection granted by order dated 17.02.2025 stands confirmed, in the following terms :

i] The applicant shall attend the concerned police station as and when required by the investigating officer.

ii] The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence of the prosecution in any manner. He shall not influence the informant, witnesses and other persons concerned with the case.

iii] The applicant shall co-operate with the investigation and also in the proceedings before the trial Court.

7] In the event, the applicant violates any of the conditions specified in this order, it shall be liable to be cancelled.

8] It is also clarified that the observations made in this order are limited to the disposal of the present anticipatory bail application and the trial Court shall proceed further in the matter without being influenced by the observations made hereinabove.

9] The application stands disposed of.

[ARUN R. PEDNEKER] JUDGE DDC