Rukhmini Baliram Mundhe v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 16 WRIT PETITION NO.1841 OF 2018 RUKHMINI BALIRAM MUNDHE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioner: Mr. M. V. Salunke h/for Mr Salunke V.D.

AGP for Respondents: Mr A. B. Chate Advocate for Respondents 4 & 5 : Mr. Sunil V. Warad

CORAM

: S. V. GANGAPURWALA & A. M. DHAVALE, JJ.

DATE : 15th April, 2019 PER COURT :

1.

Mr. Salunke, learned Advocate submits that on the last date, alongwith affidavit, it has been submitted that Education Officer has decided the Seniority. Learned Counsel, on instructions, submits that the petitioner would avail alternate remedy, however, the proceedings be directed to be decided expeditiously.

2.

Writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to avail alternate remedy. All contentions of the parties are kept open.

3.

In case the proceedings are initiated by the petitioner, the forum/authority shall endeavour to decide the proceedings, expeditiously after hearing the all the parties concerned.

(A. M.DHAVALE,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.) JPC 1/1