← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1697/2015disposed offdismissed for default

Jagdish Dnyanoba Gavane And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2015-03-13Hon'Ble Shri Justice S V Gangapurwala,Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.L. Achliya2 pages

1 wp 1697.15

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH

AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1697 OF 2015 Jagdish Dnyanoba Gavane and others .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Anand V. Indra Patil, Advocate for Petitioners. Smt. S. A. Dhumal, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 7. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 11121 OF 2014 Bhagwat Narayan Palkar and others .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Vinod Prakash Patil, Advocate for Petitioners. Shri S. B. Pulkundwar, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos. 1 to 6. CORAM :

S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. L ACHLIYA, JJ.

DATE :

13TH MARCH, 2015.

PER COURT :

.

The petitioners are covered by the judgment of this Court dated 24th February, 2015 in Writ Petition No. 3849 of 2014 with other connected writ petitions. The learned Assistant Government Pleader submit that, petitioners are similarly situated as petitioners in Writ Petition No. 3849 of 2014 with other connected writ petitions decided

2 wp 1697.15 on 24.02.2015.

2.

In the light of the above, we pass the following order. 3.

The respondents shall regularize the services of the petitioners and confirm permanency on such petitioners who have completed three years of service with technical breaks. The respondents shall also absorb the petitioners within a period of six (6) weeks from today. 4.

The petitioners who are in continuous employment till this date, shall be continued in service as regularized employees. 5.

It is directed that the petitioners shall be entitled for the regular salary from 01st April, 2015 and would not be entitled to claim monetary benefits in respect of their past service rendered by them inspite of their regularization. The petitioners shall be entitled for the continuity in service for all the purposes, except the monetary benefits. 7.

Accordingly, both the writ petitions are disposed of, with aforesaid observations and directions. No costs. [ V. L ACHLIYA, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/March 15