Mubarak Bashirsab Shaikh v. The State Of Maharashtra

2024:BHC-AUG:2738 {1} 913-WP-251-2024

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 251 OF 2024 Mubarak Bashirsab Shaikh ....Petitioner

VERSUS

The State Of Maharashtra .....Respondent .....

Ms. Sayali Tekale h/f. Mr. P.D. Dadpe, Advocate for the Petitioner. Mr. S.B. Jadhav, APP for Respondent.

.......

[CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] DATE : 8 th FEBRUARY, 2024 ORDER :

1.

Learned advocate for petitioner has restricted arguments to the alternate prayer made in the petition, by which direction is sought to the prosecution to lead and complete evidence within stipulated period of two months. 2.

Heard learned advocate for petitioner and learned APP for respondent.

3.

Learned APP submits that prosecution is ready to complete trial within two months. A grievance is however made that advocate representing petitioner in the Trial Court comes only on Saturdays' to conduct trial and therefore there is delay in conducting trial. Next date kept by the Trial Court is 02.03.2024. Bhagyawant Punde

{2} 913-WP-251-2024 s4.

Trial is therefore expedited and Trial Court should conclude trial within two months from 02.03.2024. With this direction, writ petition is disposed of. Petitioner shall co-operate in the expeditious disposal of trial.

[NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, J.] Bhagyawant Punde