The State Of Maharashtra v. Namdeo Rajaram Sanap And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD (1) CA NO.3106 of 2014 918 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3106 OF 2014 IN FAST/4041/2014 THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA

VERSUS

NAMDEO RAJARAM SANAP AND OTHERS ...

AGP for Applicant : Mr. S.P.Sonpawale Mr. R.A.Deshmukh, Adv., for Respondent no.3 ...

CORAM : P.R. BORA, J.

Dated: August 01, 2017 ...

PER COURT :- 1.

Delay of 2683 days has been caused in filing the present appeal by the State. Learned Counsel appearing for the respondents i.e. original claimants has strongly opposed for condonation of delay. In the alternative, learned Counsel has submitted that if the learned A.G.P. is prepared to argue the matter today itself on merits, the original claimants may not object for condonation of delay, and hearing the appeal on merits. Learned A.G.P. submitted that he is ready with the matter and will immediately argue the matter if the delay is condoned. In view of above, following order is passed:

agp/-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD (2) CA NO.3106 of 2014

ORDER

1.

Delay caused in filing the appeal is condoned. 2.

The appeal be registered in accordance with law. Civil Application for condonation of delay stands disposed of. 3.

On registration of the appeal, issue notice to the respondents. Shri R.A.Deshmukh, learned Counsel waives service for respondents i.e. original claimants. Service complete. Place the matter for final disposal immediately. ( P.R. BORA, J. ) ...

agp/-