Ramesh Uttam Surwase v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

ba265.25 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD BAIL APPLICATION NO.265 OF 2025 Ramesh Uttam Surwase

Versus

The State of Maharashtra ....

Advocate for the applicant : Mr. P.P. More A.P.P. for the respondent State: Mr. N.B. Patil Advocate for respondent No.2: Mr. C.S. Deshmukh (appointed) .....

CORAM : SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATED : 14th OCTOBER, 2025.

PER COURT :- 1.

Not on board. Upon being mentioned, taken on board. 2.

This Court, by order dated 26.08.2025, disposed of this application; however, the clause regarding payment of professional fees to the learned advocate appointed to prosecute the cause of respondent No.2 was inadvertently omitted from the said order. 3.

In view of the above, the fees of learned advocate Mr. C. S. Deshmukh, who was appointed to prosecute the cause of respondent No.2, shall be paid as per the schedule of fees maintained by the High Court Legal Services Sub-Committee, Aurangabad. (SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.) rlj/