The Divisional Controller v. Sou. Sangita W/O Ashok Payghan

{1} 36-ca2210.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2210 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 4094 OF 2023 The Divisional Controller, MSRTC Applicant

Versus

Sou. Sangita w/o Ashok Payghan Respondent Ms. Divya Attri, advocate holding for Mr. A. D. Wange, advocate for the Applicant Mr. Mohit R. Deshmukh, advocate for Respondents No.1 to 3. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 19th June, 2023.

PC :

The applicant-MSRTC is seeking condonation of delay of only 228 days, which appears to be caused due to obtaining approvals at various stages.. There is no strong objection from the other side and, therefore, the delay of 228 days stands condoned. Appeal be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any.

Civil Application is disposed of.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb

{2} 36-ca2210.23.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2211 OF 2023 IN FIRST APPEAL ST. NO. 4094 OF 2023 The Divisional Controller, MSRTC Applicant

Versus

Sou. Sangita w/o Ashok Payghan Respondent Ms. Divya Attri, advocate holding for Mr. A. D. Wange, advocate for the Applicant Mr. Mohit R. Deshmukh, advocate for Respondents No.1 to 3. CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 19th June, 2023.

PC :

Despite direction to deposit entire amount of compensation along with interest within the period of twelve weeks, the appellant-MSRTC failed to deposit the same. As such, Respondents No.1 and 2-claimants are at liberty to execute the impugned award by taking appropriate steps in the execution proceedings which is already fled. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) JUDGE adb