Exeutive Engineer Minor Irrigtion Lmi Latur v. Panurang Irappa Maske And Another

60 delay.odt .IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 60 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1608 OF 2025 IN FAST/4251/2025 EXEUTIVE ENGINEER MINOR IRRIGTION LMI LATUR

VERSUS

PANURANG IRAPPA MASKE AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Ganesh Vilasrao Patil Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. P.P. More ...

CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

Dated : February 25, 2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Learned Advocate appearing for applicant seeks to condone the delay of 319 days caused in filing the appeal against the award passed by the Reference Court. 2.

Perused the application. From reasons stated in the application, it appears that delay has been occasioned on account of administrative reasons. Applicant has not derived any advantage by making delay. The reasons as stated in application are controverted by filing affidavit-in-reply. 3.

In that view of the matter, case is made out to condone the delay. Hence, the application is allowed. Delay is condoned. Appeal be registered.

( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR ) JUDGE spc-