Tamanappa Malikarjunappa Patrike v. State Of Maharashtra

2025:BHC-AUG:31628 30 ca.5584.25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

30 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 5584 OF 2025 IN FAST/25632/1999 TAMANAPPA MALIKARJUNAPPA PATRIKE

VERSUS

STATE OF MAHARASHTRA ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. M. D. Narwadkar. AGP for Respondent / State : Mr. S. B. Jadhav. ...

CORAM :

SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE :

17th November, 2025.

P.C.:

Heard the learned counsel for the parties.

This is an application for condonation of delay of 2988 days caused in filing the first appeal.

The learned AGP strongly opposed the application and submitted that there is no sufficient reason to condone the delay. On perusal of the application, it appears that the delay has not been deliberately caused. Therefore, in the interest of justice, the delay deserves to be condoned on certain conditions. For the reasons stated in the application, the delay stands condoned. The application stands allowed in the interest of justice. The appeal be registered.

30 ca.5584.25.odt It is made clear that in case the amount of compensation is enhanced, the appellants shall not be entitled for the amount of interest and other statutory benefits for the delayed period. [ SANJAY A. DESHMUKH, J. ] nga