Sanjay Babuappa Rakate v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

(1) ca5924.20

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 10 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5924 OF 2020 IN RC/1539/2019 IN FAST/22141/16 SANJAY BABUAPPA RAKATE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS Mr. Anil S. Shivpuje, Advocate for the applicant Mr. P. M. Kulkarni, AGP for the respondents/State Mr. A. M. Gaikwad, Advocate for respondent No.3 CORAM:S. G. DIGE, J.

DATE:01st August, 2022 P. C.

1.

Heard the learned counsel for the applicant, the learned AGP for the respondent Nos. 1 and 2 and Mr. Gaikwad, learned counsel for respondent No.3.

2.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that this court (Corum: Smt. V. V.

Kankanwadi, J.) on 06-09-2019, has dismissed the applications of applicant on the ground that the advocate appearing for the applicant is consistently absent and had not taken positive steps.

(2) ca5924.20 3.

The learned counsel for the applicant submits that only one day he was not present and the learned counsels for the respondents were present. He was busy in other court. Hence he could not remain present when the matter was called out. Hence, requested to re-call the order passed by this court.

4.

I have heard all the learned counsels and perused the order passed by this court dated 06-09-2019.

5.

Considering the submissions of all the learned counsels, the order dated 06-09-2019, is re-called. The application No.11462/2016 in First Appeal St. No.22141/2016, is restored.

[S. G. DIGE, J.] VishalK/ca5924.20