Savita Babanrao Shitole And ORS v. State Of Maha And ORS

1 WP 1604/2004

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1604 OF 2004 Mrs. Savita d/o Babanrao Shitole and others Petitioners V E R S U S The State of Maharashtra, through its Secretary School Education Department, Mantralaya Mumbai - 32 and three others Respondents Mr. S.B. Talekar, Advocate for the petitioners Mr. S.D. Kaldate, AGP for respondent no.1/State Mr.S.T. Shelke, Advocate for respondent no.2 Mr. Deelip Bankar Patil, Advocate for respondent nos.3 & 4 CORAM : A. V. NIRGUDE & V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATE : 3rd September, 2015 PER COURT :

1.

This petition challenges a peculiar Rule, which prevented the petitioner and other similarly placed persons from making application for job of Shikshan Sevak in other Zilla Parishad once they are employed in one Zilla Parishad.

2.

Learned counsel Shri Shelke for respondent no.2 stated that in the mean time the rule is no more in practice. The rule was made in the situation which arose in 2004, but the situation is now different.

2 WP 1604/2004 3.

The learned counsel for respondent nos.3 and 4 stated that if the petitioners want their original documents back, they can make separate application and the same would be considered as per rules. If the documents of the petitioners are still with respondent nos.3 or 4, the petitioners are at liberty to make application for return of documents and same will be considered as per rules.

4.

In view of above, the petition is now infructuous and disposed of accordingly.

( V.K. JADHAV, J. ) ( A.V. NIRGUDE, J. ) SRM/3/9/15