Rajesaheb Lalasaheb Sanglikar v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 WP 3389-2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.3389 OF 2017 Rajesaheb Lalasaheb Sanglikar

...Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others

...Respondents

---- Mr. V. H. Solanke, Advocate for petitioner Mr. S. B. Yawalkar, AGP for respondents No.1 to 6/ State MS. Asha S. Rasal, Advocate for respondent No.7 Mr. U. S. Mote, Advocate for respondent No.8 ---- CORAM : R. M. BORDE & SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI. JJ.

DATE : 10-10-2017 PER COURT :

1.

An individual grievance is raised in respect of raising of illegal structure by the respondent No.7, in violation of the layout plan. It is contended that, the encroachment is raised on the road, thereby putting the petitioner and others to inconvenience. It is further pointed out that, in spite of issuance of directions by the SubDivisional officer and Tahsildar, to remove the encroachment, no steps have been taken.

2 WP 3389-2017 2.

It would be open for the petitioner to persuade the concerned authorities for taking appropriate steps against the encroacher. 3.

It would be also open for the petitioner to avail of the alternate remedy provided under law, for redressal of the grievances. 4.

No interference is called for.

5.

Writ petition is devoid of merits. With liberty to avail alternate remedy provided under law, writ petition stands disposed of. [SMT. VIBHA KANKANWADI] [R. M. BORDE] JUDGE JUDGE vjg/-.