Dinesh Shankar Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

1 cp 119.16

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 119 OF 2016 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 4298 OF 2007 Dinesh Shankar Patil .. Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri S. H. Panchal, Advocate h/f Shri V. B. Garud, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Shri M. B. Bharaswadkar, A.G.P. for Respondents/State. CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND K. L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE : 17TH OCTOBER, 2016.

PER COURT :

.

The learned counsel for the petitioner on instructions states that, the order of which contempt is alleged has been complied with on 22nd September, 2016.

2.

The learned A. G. P. also states that, amount due and payable to the contempt petitioner is paid on 22nd September, 2016.

2 cp 119.16 3.

In the light of that, the order of this Court stands complied, though belatedly. The contempt stands purged. The contempt petition is disposed of. No costs.

[ K. L. WADANE, J. ] [ S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ] bsb/Oct. 16