Bombay High CourtWP/1846/2008dismissedrule discharged

Arun Eknath Lalage v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

2017-08-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice R.D. Dhanuka,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal1 pages

{1} WP 1846 of 2008.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.1846 OF 2008 Arun s/o Eknath Lolage Petitioner

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & Others Respondents Mr.S.R.Barlinge, Advocate for the Petitioner (absent). Mr.V.N.Patil, AGP for the respondent no.1.

Mr.S.P.Shah, Sr.Counsel for respondent nos.2 & 3. _______________ CORAM: R.D.Dhanuka & Sunil K.Kotwal, JJ.

DATE: 31st August, 2017 PER COURT :- 1) This matter was on board on 14th June, 2017 when none appeared for the petitioner. It was made clear that if the petitioner remains absent on the next date, the matter would be dismissed.

2) None appeared for the petitioner even today. Writ Petition is accordingly dismissed in default. Rule is discharged. Interim Order, if any, stands vacated. (Sunil K.Kotwal, J) (R.D.Dhanuka, J) spt