Tatyarao Bharatrao Bhusane And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

RAST 4621/12 in WP 883/11 - 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD REVIEW APPLICATION (St) NO.4621/2012 IN WRIT PETITION NO.883/2011 Tatyarao Bharatrao Bhusane and another.

...Applicants..

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & others.

...Respondents...

.....

Shri A.M. Hajare, Advocate for applicants.

Shri N.B. Patil, AGP for respondent nos.1 to 5. .....

CORAM: S.V. GANGAPURWALA & K.L. WADANE, JJ.

DATE: 20.08.2016 ORDER :

1] Heard learned counsel for the applicants and the learned AGP for the respondent nos.1 to 5.

2] The applicants are seeking direct appointment in the employment of the respondents from the project affected person / earthquake affected person category. The writ petition is dismissed after hearing the learned Advocates for the respective parties on the basis of the judgment of the Full Bench of this Court in the case of Rajendra Pandurang Pagare & another v. State of Maharashtra & others reported in 2009(4) Mh.L.J., 961.

RAST 4621/12 in WP 883/11 - 2 - 3] The Full Bench of this Court has held that the candidates from project affected person or earthquake affected person category are not entitled for direct appointment and they have to compete amongst themselves. 4] In the light of that, no case for review is made out. The review application is dismissed. No costs. (K.L. WADANE, J.) (S.V. GANGAPURWALA, J.) ndk/c2081624.doc