Surekha Sudhakar Dane v. The Maharashtra State Election Commission And Others

976-wp-2763-21

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2763 OF 2021 Surekha W/o Sudhakar Dane ... Petitioner.

Versus

The Maharashtra State Election Commission and others ... Respondents.

....

Mr. R.V. Gore, Advocate for the Petitioner.

Mr. A.B.Kadethankar, Advocate for Respondent No.1. Mr. P.K. Lakhotiya, A.G.P. for Respondent Nos.2 to 4. ....

CORAM : S.V. GANGAPURWALA AND SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI, JJ.

DATE : 10th FEBRUARY, 2021 PER COURT:- 1.

Mr. Gore, the learned counsel for the petitioner submits that since 1995, the post of Sarpanch of Grampanchayat Jambhala was never reserved for S.C. (women) category. The petitioner is elected as a member of the Grampanchayat Jambhala from S.C. (women) category.

2.

We have heard the learned A.G.P. also

976-wp-2763-21 3.

It appears that the election of Sarpanch is already held. The elected candidate is also not a party. Moreover, there is no data on record to show the descending order of the S.C. population of the various Grampanchayats in this Taluqa. In absence of the entire data, it is not possible to consider the case put forth by the petitioner. It is for the authorities to consider the objections . 4.

The Writ petition disposed of. No costs.

( SHRIKANT D. KULKARNI ) ( S.V. GANGAPURWALA ) JUDGE JUDGE S.P. Rane