← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/1683/2006disposed offdismissed for default

Bhalerao Pandharinath Borse v. Hirdi Sahitya Sammellan Allahabad And ORS

2018-08-02Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane3 pages

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1683 OF 2006 Shri. Bhalerao Pandharinath Borse, Age Adult, Occ: Service, Nutan Madhyamik Vidhyalaya, Indave, Taluka Sakri, Dist. Pune.

..PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

Hindi Sahitya Sammellan, Allahabad, Hindi Vishva Vidyaklaya, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh.

2.

Secretary, Ministry of Personnel, P.G. & Pensions, Department of Personal and Training Government of India NEW DELHI.

3.

Secretary, Department of Employment, Government of Maharashtra, Maharashtra, Bombay 400 032.

4.

President, Shri. Shiv Maharashtra Pratisthan, Dhule.

5.

Union of India.

6.

State of Maharashtra.

..RESPONDENTS Mr R.B. Bagul, A.G.P. for respondent/State;

(2) CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE & S. M. GAVHANE,JJ.

DATE : 2nd AUGUST, 2018 ORAL ORDER :

Perusal of the record shows that initially the petition was filed as Writ Petition No. 3562 of 1994 at Principal Seat. Mr. N.V. Pradhan, learned Counsel was appearing for the petitioner. Subsequently, the matter was transferred to this Bench and it was renumbered as Writ Petition No.1683 of 2006. On 2nd March, 1995 'Rule' was granted in the petition and the petition was directed to be heard along with Writ Petition No.1637 of 1989.

2.

Perusal of the record shows that the petitioner was served with transfer notice, none appeared for the petitioner. The record further shows that connected petition i.e. Writ Petition No. 1637 of 1989 was dismissed by this Court on 30th July, 2001 for non prosecution.

(3) 3.

It seems that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the petition. The petition is accordingly dismissed for non prosecution.

(S. M. GAVHANE) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE Tupe