Dattatraya Panjabrao Shinde And ANR v. The State Of Maharashtra, Through The Collector Beed And ORS

23-CA.4325-25.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 23 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 4325 OF 2025 IN FAST/4549/2025 DATTATRAYA PANJABRAO SHINDE AND ANR

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA, THROUGH THE COLLECTOR BEED AND ORS ...

Advocate for Applicants : Mr. Bidve Yogeshwar L. AGP for Respondent/State : Mrs. M. N. Ghanekar. ...

CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.

DATE : 17.11.2025 PER COURT :- 1.

Heard both sides.

2.

Applicants seek condonation of delay of 981 days and they are ready to give up interest and the statutory benefits for the delayed period.

3.

Application is contested by learned AGP appearing for respondent-State.

4.

The averments of the application are not denied specifically. I do not find any oblique motive in preferring the appeal belatedly. But, I do not find lapses on the part of the applicants for not circulating the matter till 10.06.2025 from the date of filing application.

23-CA.4325-25.odt 5.

Civil application is partly allowed condoning delay of 981 days on condition that applicants shall not be entitled to statutory benefits and the interest for the delayed period as well as for the lapses stated above.

First Appeal 6.

Admit.

7.

Learned AGP waives service of notice for respondentState. 8.

Call for Record and Proceedings from the concerned Court.

9.

Print is dispensed with.

10.

The applicants shall not be entitled to statutory benefits and the interest for the delayed period as well as for the lapses. (SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J.) ...

vmk/-