← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/3938/2001disposed off

Anil Premraj Jawale v. Bhusawal Arts Science And P.O.N.Comm.Coll.And ORS

2025-03-18Hon'Ble The Chief Justice,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Ravindra V. Ghuge3 pages

2025:BHC-AUG:7907-DB -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 3938 OF 2001 Shri. Anil Premraj Jawale Age 53 years, Occu. Service, R/o Plot No. 37, Professor Colony, Jamner Road, Bhusawal, Dist. Jalgaon.

...Petitioner

-Versus1.

Bhusawal Arts, Science & P.O.N. Commerce College Bhusawal, Dist. Jalgaon.

Through Its Principal.

2.

The Chairman, Executive Committee, Tapti Education Society at Bhusawal, Dist. Jalgaon.

3.

The Joint Director, Higher Education Grants, Jalgaon Region, Jalgaon.

4.

The State of Maharashtra Through Education Department.

5.

Vasant Baliram Bhole Age 58 years, Occu. Service-Employee Opp. Bamb Chambers, Jamner Road, at Bhusawal, Dist. Jalgaon.

...Respondents

.....

Mr. Sanket Kulkarni, advocate for the Petitioner Mr. S.S. Bora, advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 Mr. A.B. Girase, Govt. Pleader for Respondent Nos. 3 and 4. .....

-2CORAM : ALOK ARADHE, C.J. & RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATE : 18th MARCH, 2025.

P.C. :

1.

The learned Advocates for the respective parties jointly submit that this Court had noted the pendency of the Writ Petition against the order of reinstatement granted to the Petitioner by the Tribunal. Since the Writ Petition No. 5049 of 1999 was pending before the Learned Single Judge, this Court ordered on 01.04.2015, that the Petitioner should move this Petition after the challenge to the College Tribunal's order is decided by the learned Single Judge. 2.

The learned Advocate for the Petitioner tenders a copy of the order dated 21.09.2023, recording the compromise of the parties before the District Court at Bhusawal. Therefore, in terms of the compromise, the Management withdrew the Writ Petition challenging the order of the School Tribunal, before the Learned Single Judge.

-33.

Both the learned Advocates submit that nothing survives to be decided in this Writ Petition and the Petition be disposed off.

4.

In view of the above, this Petition stands disposed off. Rule discharged.

(RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.) (CHIEF JUSTICE) rlj/