Padmakar Dnyanoba Kasbe v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:30177-DB 96.2015CP.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY,

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

924 CONTEMPT PETITION NO. 96 OF 2015 IN WP/6934/2012 PADMAKAR DNYANOBA KASBE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER ...

Advocate for the Petitioner : Mr. Thombre Chandrakant V. AGP for Respondent/State : Mr.A.R. Kale Advocate for Respondent no.3 : Mr. V.V. Bhavthankar h/f Mr.Tandale P.R.

...

CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV, JJ.

DATED : 4th NOVEMBER, 2025.

ORDER :

.

Learned Advocate for respondent no.3, on instructions, makes a statement that representation of the petitioner is decided, and therefore, the order is complied with.

2.

Accepting the said statement, contempt petition is disposed of.

(VAISHALI PATIL-JADHAV,J.) ( NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI,J.) sga