← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/2523/2017disposed offdismissed for default

Satyanarayan Pannalalji Ladda v. Midc Thr Divisional Office, Division Office, Latur And ANR

2019-02-20Hon'Ble Shri Justice T.V. Nalawade,Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sunil K. Kotwal2 pages

(1) CA No.2523/2017

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

907 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 2523 OF 2017 IN FIRST APPEAL NO. 2216 OF 2016 Satyanarayan Pannalalji Ladda.

Applicant.

Versus

M.I.D.C. Through Divisional Office, Latur and another.

Respondents.

*** Mr. G.N. Kulkarni, Advocate for the applicant. Mr. M.M. Nerlikar, A.G.P. for the State/respondent No.2. Mr. S.S. Dande, Advocate for respondent No.1. *** CORAM : T.V. NALAWADE AND SUNIL K. KOTWAL, JJ.

Dated :

21 February 2019.

ORDER :- .

Heard both sides. Though the application is filed for granting permission to release the remaining amount out of 25% amount of enhanced compensation, when this Court expressed that after considering all the aspects this Court has made the order dated 24.06.2016, the learned Counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is not in a position to give solvent

(2) CA No.2523/2017 surety in respect of 25 % of the amount deposited in the Court as per the order made on 24.06.2016. He submits that it is possible for the applicant to give bank guarantee of this amount also. 2.

So, the application is allowed to that extent and permission is given to the applicant to give bank guarantee of any Nationalized or Scheduled Bank in respect of 25% of the amount mentioned in para 2 (b) of the order dated 24.06.2016. 3.

In those terms the Civil Application is allowed and disposed of.

( SUNIL K. KOTWAL) ( T.V. NALAWADE ) JUDGE JUDGE vdd/