← Library
Bombay High CourtCA/4048/2018disposed offdismissed for default

Pandharinath Parbhanna Aspatwar v. Jayshree Mahadev Thavle And Others

2019-01-24Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane2 pages

4048.18ca (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4048 OF 2018 IN WRIT PETITION NO.8468 OF 2017 Pandharinath s/o Parbhanna Aspatwar ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Smt. Jayashree w/o hadev Thavle & ors.

..RESPONDENTS Mr R. J. Godbole, Advocate for applicant;

Mr V. D. Salunke, Advocate for respondent No.1 Ms R. P. Gour, A.G.P. for respondent Nos. 3 & 4; Mr T. G. Gaikwad, Advocate for respondent No.2 CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND S. M. GAVHANE, JJ.

DATE : 24th January, 2019 ORAL ORDER:

Heard Mr Godbole, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant.

2.

The applicant prays for intervention in the writ petition. The submission of seeking intervention is reflected in paragraph 7 of the application and it is stated that the the petitioner in the said writ petition has claimed that she being belonging to SC category, be appointed by way of promotion as a Head Master and the applicant says that as the post claimed by the petitioner goes to ST category candidate, intervener's right will be adversely affected if the petition is allowed.

4048.18ca (2) 3.

Mr Salunke, learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner in writ petition submits that the petitioner is claiming right over the post independently and he further fairly submits that the petitioner is having no objection for permitting the applicant/intervenor to participate in the petition.

4.

In view of this fact, the prayer for seeking intervene is allowed, needless to state keeping the contentions of the parties open for hearing/decision of the petition. Amendment be carried out within one week from today. The Civil Application is disposed of. Post the petition for further consideration on 7th February, 2019. (S. M. GAVHANE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.) sjk