Laxman Damodar Chaudhari And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

cp127.15 -1-

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CONT. PETITION NO. 127 OF 2015 IN WP/7054/2007 LAXMAN DAMODAR CHAUDHARI AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Petitioners : Mr. Talhar Ajay G. AGP for Respondents 1 to 3: Mr. K.J. Ghute Patil Advocate for Respondents 4 and 5: Mr. P.N. Kutti .....

CORAM : S. V. GANGAPURWALA AND V. K. JADHAV, JJ.

DATED : 8th JULY, 2015 P.C. :- 1.

It is submitted by the learned counsel for the respondents that within the time extended by the Apex Court, the respondents have complied the order and paid the amount to the petitioners. 2.

Mr. Talher, the learned counsel says that there is shortfall of the amount. In the contempt petition, it is not possible for us to enter into the dispute about quantum of the amount. In case the petitioners are aggrieved on the ground that less amount is received by them, the petitioners may take up such a proceeding, as is permissible in law. The contempt stands purged. Contempt petition stands disposed of. No costs.

( V. K. JADHAV, J.) ( S. V. GANGAPURWALA, J. ) rlj/