Vinod Lahu Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Others

2304.22WP

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 949 WRIT PETITION NO.2304 OF 2022 VINOD LAHU PATIL

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & OTHERS ...

Advocate for the petitioner : Mr.R.D.Bhalerao AGP for Respondent-State : Mr.A.S.Shinde ...

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA & S.G.DIGE, JJ.

DATE : 17.02.2022 P.C. :

1] The grievance of the petitioner is that the benefit of 6th and 7th pay commission has not been properly accorded to the petitioner. The representation is given to respondent no.5. The same is not yet decided. 2] The learned AGP accepts notice for all respondents and submits that the authority would consider it on its own merits.

3] In case, the representation of the petitioner [Page-22] is pending with respondent no.5 and respondent no.5 is competent to take decision upon it, then the same shall be decided in accordance with law and policy, expeditiously and preferably within a period of six [06] months from today.

2304.22WP 4] Writ Petition is disposed of. No costs.

[S.G.DIGE, J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.] DDC