Raghunath Patilba Shelke v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 949 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3051 OF 2018 IN WP/1845/2008 RAGHUNATH PATILBA SHELKE

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mrs. Jamdhade Maya R. AGP for Respondents 1 and 2 : Mr. S.G.Karlekar ---- CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND SUNIL K.KOTWAL, JJ.

DATE : JULY 27, 2018 O R D E R :

None appears for respondent nos. 3 and 4, though served.

Learned A.G.P. appears for respondents 1 and 2. 2.

We have considered additional affidavit filed. It is submitted that the affidavit is filed and the reasons are mentioned for not attending the matter . 3.

Considering the reasons given in the application and the relief claimed in the writ petition, Civil Application is allowed in terms of prayer clauses 'B and C' on condition that objections are removed within three weeks from today. The said condition is a condition precedent.

ca3051.18 4.

In case, the applicant removes office objections, then in writ petition re-issue notice to respondent nos. 3 and 4.

5.

Civil Application is disposed of. No costs.

[SUNIL K.KOTWAL, J.] [S.V.GANGAPURWALA, J.] mahajansb/