Shivaji Narsimalu Racharlawar And Another v. The State Of Maharashtra And Others

2024:BHC-AUG:13891-DB 1 wp 1886.18

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 1886 OF 2018 Shivaji Narsimalu Racharlawar and another .. Petitioners

Versus

The State of Maharashtra and others .. Respondents Shri Krishna P. Rodge, Advocate h/f Shri P. G. Rodge, Advocate for the Petitioners.

Shri P. S. Patil, Addl.G.P. for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 3. Shri Anand V. Indrale Patil, Advocate for the Respondent Nos. 5 and 6.

CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND SHAILESH P. BRAHME, JJ.

DATE : 11 JULY, 2024.

FINAL ORDER :

.

Leave is granted to correct the nomenclature of the respondent No. 3. Amendment to be carried ut forthwith. 2.

Petitioners who were appointed in the handicap school which was de-recognized and transferred to the respondent No. 5 are seeking absorption having been rendered surplus in the light of Rule 25-A of the M. E. P. S. Rules, 1981.

3.

Learned advocate for the respondent Nos. 5 and 6 referring to the affidavit in reply submits that since the petitioners had not approached it, the appointments were made long back and they

2 wp 1886.18 cannot be absorbed with them.

4.

Learned Addl. G. P. on instructions of the respondent No. 3 submits that matter is under active consideration of Deputy Commissioner of Persons with Disability, Pune who would be taking appropriate decision for absorption of the petitioners as well as several other similarly placed individuals, within a period of three (03) months. We accept the statement as an undertaking to the Court and dispose of writ petition by directing the respondent No. 3/ Deputy Commissioner of Persons with Disability, Pune to take appropriate steps.

[ SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ] [ MANGESH S. PATIL, J. ] bsb/July 24