← Library
Bombay High CourtSA/518/2021compramised

Dagdu Gyana Bawanche And Another v. Rasika Nagorao Mankari And Another

2024-07-26Hon'Ble Shri Justice Sandipkumar C. More2 pages

2024:BHC-AUG:15727 913 SA 518-2021

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 913 SECOND APPEAL NO. 518 OF 2021 1.

Dagdu Gyana Bawanche 2.

Maruti Dagdu Bawanche APPELLANTS

VERSUS

1.

Rasika Nagorao Mankari 2.

Balika/Vimal Waghambar Suryawanshi RESPONDENTS ...

Mr. M.G. Biradar - Advocate for Appellants Mr. R.B. Deshmukh - Advocate for Respondents ....

CORAM : SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATE : 26th July, 2024 PER COURT :

1.

The parties have arrived at settlement and accordingly, compromise terms in this appeal, were entered into, which were marked as "X". These compromise terms, vide order dated 25.07.2024, were referred to the learned Registrar (Judicial) of this Court for verification of the contents. Accordingly, report of Registrar (Judicial) dated 25.07.2024 in this appeal has been submitted to this Court mentioning that Pooja K.

1/2

913 SA 518-2021 the parties in this appeal have voluntarily entered into compromise terms.

2.

Therefore, the compromise terms are accepted and the Second Appeal is disposed of in terms of these compromise terms.

3.

Decree be drawn accordingly.

4.

The Court fees be refunded to the appellants as per rules.

5.

Pending civil applications, if any, are also disposed of. [ SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE ] JUDGE Pooja K.

2/2