Deorao Sheshrao Adhav And ORS v. The State Of Maharashtra And ORS

(1) 939 CA-9501.2019.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 939 CIVIL APPLICATION NO.9501 OF 2019 IN FAST/4792/2019 DEORAO SHESHRAO ADHAV AND OTHERS

VERSUS

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS ...

Mr. Arun Koralkar, Advocate for the applicants. Mr. A.A. Jagatkar, A.G.P. for respondent Nos.1 and 2. Mr. R.R. Imle, Advocate for respondent No. 3. ...

CORAM :

SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.

DATED :

27.07.2022.

ORDER:- 1.

Heard learned Counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.P. and learned Counsel for contesting respondent No. 3 - Acquiring Body.

2.

Though the application is strongly opposed by the learned Counsel for the Acquiring Body on the ground of inordinate delay, but it appears that that after acquisition of agricultural land and house of the applicants, they had shifted to Pune, and therefore, could not exercise their statutory right of fling appeal. Therefore, in view of the reasons mentioned in the application, the application is allowed and the delay of 1314 days in fling the appeal, stands condoned subject to

(2) 939 CA-9501.2019.odt condition that the applicants shall not claim any interest for the said period of delay.

3.

The Civil Application is disposed of accordingly. 4.

First Appeal (St) No. 4792 of 2019 be placed for admission after removal of offce objections, if any. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, J.) vd_dhirde