Sk. Mohamad Chandsaheb Bagwan v. Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation Through Regional Manager Latur And Another

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3208 OF 2015 IN REJECTED CASE NO.292 OF 2015 Sk. Mohamad s/o Chandsaheb Bagwan ..APPLICANT

VERSUS

Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation, & anr.

..RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3206 OF 2015 IN REJECTED CASE NO.290 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.3207 OF 2015 IN REJECTED CASE NO.294 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5949 OF 2015 IN REJECTED CASE NO.189 OF 2015 WITH CIVIL APPLICATION NO.5954 OF 2015 IN REJECTED CASE NO.1846 OF 2014 Mr Mahesh S. Patil, Advocate for applicants;

Mr S. S. Dande, Advocate for respondent No.1; Mr A. S. Shinde, A.G.P. for respondent No.2 CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND S. M. GAVHANE, JJ.

DATE : 22nd June, 2018

(2) ORAL ORDER:

Heard Mr Patil, learned Counsel appearing for the applicants. It is submitted that on non-compliance of removal of office objections, more particularly failure to deposit deficit court fees, the registration of the appeals was refused by the learned Registrar (Judl.), by orders dated 3rd February, 2015 and 11th November, 2014.

2.

Mr Patil further submits that respondent No.1 - Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation has already filed group of appeals and by an order dated 21st August, 2009, these appeals were admitted by the Division Bench of this Court.

3.

Mr Patil submits that the applicants are before this Court for just compensation and the grievance of the applicants is that a meager amount of compensation is awarded. He further submits that refusal of registration of the appeals on technical ground would result in causing prejudice to the applicants. He further submits that the applicants are ready to deposit the deficit court fees within a period two weeks, if time granted by this Court. 3.

Mr Dande, learned Counsel for the respondent No.1 and the learned A.G.P. are not disputing the fact that the appeals filed by respondent No.1 - Maharashtra Industrial Development Corporation are already admitted by this Court.

(3) 4.

In view of above referred fact, the civil applications are allowed, subject to deposit of amount of deficit court fees within a period of two weeks and removal of other office objections, if any. Civil Applications are allowed in terms of prayer clause (B) and disposed of accordingly. (S. M. GAVHANE, J.) (PRASANNA B. VARALE, J.) sjk