Raghunath Annasaheb Motale v. State Of Maharashtra And Others

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.7834 OF 2015.

Raghunath S/o Annasaheb Motale Vs. The State of Maharashtra and others.

Office Notes, Office Memoranda of Coram, appearances, Court's orders or directions and Registrar's orders.

Court's or Judge's orders Mr.D.R.Jayabhar, advocate for the Petitioner. Mr.A.M.Phule, A.G.P for the State.

Mr.M.S.Adate, advocate holding for Mr.S.S.Tope, advocate for Respondent No.4.

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA AND A.M.BADAR,JJ.

Date : 29.02.2016.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

The petitioner seeks directions against Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to decide the pending claim for grant of rental compensation. We have heard learned counsel for respective parties. It appears that in 1989 notice was issued to the acquiring body and the State through Collector for grant of rental compensation.

3.

Upon going through the documents filed along with the petition, it does not appear that any application was given to the appropriate authority/SLAO for deciding the rental compensation. 4.

The petitioner may make an application to the

SLAO/appropriate authority for grant of rental compensation. On receipt of the application, the appropriate authority shall consider all the relevant aspects of the matter and decide the said application after hearing the parties concerned expeditiously, preferably within nine (9) months from the receipt of the application. 5.

The Writ Petition is accordingly disposed of. No costs. (A.M.BADAR,J.) (S.V.GANGAPURWALA,J.) Dt.29.02.2016.

asp/office/wp7834.15