Bombay High CourtAPPLN/855/2015disposed off

Pratap S/O Sakharam Patil v. The State Of Maharashtra

2015-07-31Hon'Ble Shri Justice V.M. Deshpande2 pages

G.A.Ghule [P.A.] 1/2 cri.appln. 1210.15 a.w. cri.appln. 855.15..sxw

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY.

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

Criminal Appellate Jurisdiction.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.1210 Of 2015.

Alongwith CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO.855 OF 2015.

CRI.APPLN. 1210/15.

Pratap Sakharam Patil.

Versus.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Pratap Sakharam Patil.

Versus.

The State of Maharashtra & Ors.

Appearance => Mr. S.B. Bhapkar, Advocate for the Applicant in both the Criminal Applications.

Mr. A.S. Shinde, Additional Public Prosecutor for the State of Maharashtra.

Ms. Monica Dahal, Advocate h/for Mr. Swapnil Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM

V.M. Deshpande, J.

DATE :

31st July, 2015.

Per Court :- Heard Mr. S.B. Bhapkar, learned counsel for the Applicant in both the Criminal Applications and Ms. Monica Dahal, Advocate h/for Mr. Swapnil Patil, Advocate for Respondent No.2 - accused in both the Criminal Applications.

[2] By filing Criminal Application No.1210/15, the Applicant is challenging the regular bail order dated 21st January, 2015 passed by

2/2 cri.appln. 1210.15 a.w. cri.appln. 855.15..sxw the learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class (Court No.III), Bhusawal, District - Jalgaon, in Crime No.5/2015; where-as by filing Criminal Application No.855/15 the Applicant is challenging the anticipatory bail order dated 3rd February, 2015 passed by the learned Additional Sessions Judge, Bhusawal in Criminal Bail Application No.37 Of 2015 in respect of Crime No.5/15 registered with City Police Station, Bhusal for the offences punishable under Section/s 39 and 45 of the Maharashtra Money Lending (Regulation) Ordinance, 2014 and under Section/s 384, 504 and 506 of the Indian Penal Code. [3] Mr. Bhapkar, learned counsel submitted that, during pendency of these two Criminal Applications, the Investigating Officer has completed his entire investigation and charge sheet is already filed before the court of law.

Ms. Monica Dahal, learned counsel submitted that, after filing of the charge sheet, Respondent No.2 in these two Criminal Applications are already appeared before the court below and regular bail is also granted in their favour.

[4] In that view of the matter, nothing survived in these two Criminal Application. Hence, these two Criminal Applications are disposed of.

(V.M. DESHPANDE, J.)