Shankar Nagnath Gangulwar v. State Of Maharashtra Through Its Secretary And Another

2025:BHC-AUG:5226-DB 2337.25wp (1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD 29 WRIT PETITION NO. 2337 OF 2025 SHANKAR NAGNATH GANGULWAR

VERSUS

1. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA THROUGH ITS SECRETARY, TRIBAL DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT, MANTRALAYA, MUMBAI

2. SCHEDULED TRIBE CASTE CERTIFICATE SCRUTINY COMMITTEE, KINWAT ....

Mr R. K. Mendadkar and Mr Vijay Gangalwad, Advocates for petitioner Ms S. S. Joshi, A.G.P. for respondents/State CORAM : MANGESH S. PATIL AND PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, JJ.

DATE : 24th February, 2025 PER COURT:

1.

The petitioner is anxious to get the decision of respondent No.2/scrutiny committee in a proceeding for validation of his tribe certificate and is apprehending that it would make adverse effect on his employment inasmuch as the employer is insisting for the tribe certificate.

2.

Learned A.G.P., on instructions, submits that the petitioner's proposal is not traceable.

2337.25wp (2) 3.

We dispose of this writ petition with a direction to the respondent/scrutiny committee to decide the petitioner's proposal, as expeditiously as possible and in any case within a period of six months. The petitioner shall not be terminated during that period. 4.

The petitioner shall cooperate with the respondent/committee if it calls upon him for reconstruction of the proposal/file.

5.

It is clarified that the committee shall not insist for the original caste/tribe certificate.

(PRAFULLA S. KHUBALKAR, J.) (MANGESH S. PATIL, J.) sjk