Eknath Murlidhar Waghmare v. The Chief Security Commissioner Railway Protection Force South Central Railway Secunderabad And ANR

{1} wp2714.18.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO. 2714 OF 2018 Eknath s/o Murlidhar Waghmare Petitioner

Versus

The Chief Security Commissioner & another Respondents Mr. A.S. Deshpande, advocate holding for Mr. G.K. Kshirsagar, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S.B. Deshpande, ASG for respondent no. 1. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 2710 OF 2018 Pawan Babarao Ingle Petitioner

Versus

The Chief Security Commissioner & another Respondents Mr. A.S. Deshpande, advocate holding for Mr. G.K. Kshirsagar, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S.B. Deshpande, ASG for respondent no. 1. WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4750 OF 2017 Kishore s/o gundappa Malkunaik Petitioner

Versus

The Union of India & others Respondents Mr. A.S. Deshpande, advocate holding for Mr. G.K. Kshirsagar, advocate for petitioner.

Mr. S.B. Deshpande, ASG for respondent no. 1.

{2} wp2714.18.odt CORAM : R.M.BORDE & MANGESH S. PATIL, JJ.

DATE : 11th SEPTEMBER, 2018 PER COURT:

1.

Since the challenge raised in the instant petitions relates to transfer of employees, it is desirable not to cause interference at this stage during continuance of the enquiry proceedings. 2.

Learned counsel for respondent-employer states on instructions that the enquiry proceedings initiated against petitioners will be concluded within a period of three months from today. Statement made is accepted.

3.

In view of above, writ petitions stand disposed of with liberty to petitioners to take recourse to the remedies available in law in relation to orders passed in the enquiry proceedings. MANGESH S. PATIL R.M.BORDE JUDGE JUDGE dyb