Vishal Amrutrao Gadekar And Others v. The State Of Maharashtra And Another

{1} crappln640.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 640 OF 2022 IN CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4125 OF 2019 Vishal Amrutrao Gadekar & others Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Ms. Sunita G . Sonawane, advocate for the applicants Mr. R. D. Sanap, APP for Respondent No.1.

Mr. B. S. Dhawale, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : V.K.JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 24th February, 2022.

PC :

Though this Criminal Application is fled belatedly for carrying out the amendment seeking quashing of the proceedings, however, we consider the same since the parties have arrived at an amicable settlement. Respondent No.2 has also fled affdavit-inreply. In view of the same and for the reasons stated in the application, Criminal Application No. 640 of 2022 is allowed in terms of prayer clause "B".

Criminal Application is accordingly disposed of. (SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V.K.JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb

{2} crappln640.22.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 4125 OF 2019 Vishal Amrutrao Gadekar & others Applicants

Versus

The State of Maharashtra & another Respondents Ms. Sunita G . Sonawane, advocate for the applicants Mr. R. D. Sanap, APP for Respondent No.1.

Mr. B. S. Dhawale, advocate for Respondent No.2. CORAM : V.K.JADHAV AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.

DATE : 24th February, 2022.

PC :

Leave to fle copy of the charge sheet.

Stand over to 10.03.2022.

(SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE) (V.K.JADHAV) JUDGE JUDGE adb