← Library
Bombay High CourtWP/2692/2019disposed offdismissed for default

Balaji S/O Uttam Totewad (Minor) Through His Natural Guardian Father Uttam Laxmanrao Totewad v. Sub Divisional Officer Bhokar Dist Nanded And ORS

2019-03-01Hon'Ble Shri Justice Prasanna B. Varale,Hon'Ble Shri Justice S. M. Gavhane4 pages

(1)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD WRIT PETITION NO.2692 OF 2019 Balaji s/o Uttam Totewad Age: 14 years (Minor) Through his natural guardian i.e. father - Uttam Laxmanrao Totewad, Age: 37 years, Occ: Agri., R/o. Vaijapur, Post Niwgha, Tq. Mukhed, Dist. Nanded ..PETITIONER

VERSUS

1.

Sub Divisional Officer, Bhokar, Dist. Nanded 2.

Scheduled Tribe Certificate Scrutiny Committee, Aurangabad through its Member Secretary 3.

Shri Chatrapati Shahu Maharaj Sainiki Vidyalaya, Udgir, Dist. Latur through its Head Master ..RESPONDENTS Mr Sagar S. Phatale, Advocate for petitioner; Mr A.R. Kale, A.G.P. for respondent/State CORAM : PRASANNA B. VARALE AND S.M.GAVHANE, JJ.

DATE : 1st MARCH, 2019 ORAL ORDER :

Heard learned Counsel appearing for the

(2) petitioner.

2.

The petitioner approached the Sub Divisional Officer, Bhokar, District Nanded for issuance of the caste certificate. The documents were presented before the Sub Divisional Officer to seek support for the claim. Along with other documents, the petitioner also placed on record the copy of validity certificate issued in favour of uncle of the petitioner. The Sub Divisional Officer, raising ground that the petitioner failed to submit any document before 1950 and the petitioner also failed to show that the petitioner was resident of the said area prior to 1950, which comes under the jurisdiction of Sub Divisional Officer, Bhokar, rejected the application.

3.

The appeal was preferred before the Scrutiny Committee. The Committee re-iterating ghe grounds of the Sub Divisional Officer, rejected the appeal. Learned Counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this issue is dealt with

(3) the Division Bench time and again and it is consistent view of this Court that the authority and more particularly, the Scrutiny Committee ought not to have rejected the appeal raising technical riders but it is only prima facie satisfaction of the Committee. This Court also observed that the caste certificate being issued to the petitioner would be further subjected to the Scrutiny Committee for validation and in the validation process, a thorough inquiry and assessment of the claim is accepted. As such, the Scrutiny Committee may undertake that exercise. The petitioner also placed on record the order passed by this Court in bunch of petitions on 23rd January, 2019 i.e. Writ Petition No. 604 OF 2019 (Pandurang Mahadeo Gonewad vs. Sub Divisional Officer, Bhokar & anr.) and other petitions.

4.

Resultantly, the petition is allowed.

5.

The orders passed by the Sub Divisional Officer, Bhokar, District Nanded as well as the

(4) Scrutiny Committee are quashed and set aside. Respondent No.1 Sub Divisional Officer, Bhokar, District Nanded is directed to issue caste certificate to the petitioner that the petitioner belongs to 'Mannervarlu, scheduled tribe', as early as possible.

6.

With these directions, the petition is disposed of.

( S.M.GAVHANE ) (PRASANNA B. VARALE) JUDGE JUDGE Tupe